Kelsey Best
Digital Creativity
Summary 6.2.
Ethics in Visual Research
This article asks the vital
question: in a world rife with social rights awareness and the profusion of
legislation, is it really a good idea to ignore or downplay ethics? The author
focuses on two main issues concerning visual research: acting with integrity
and respecting the rights of others. Contextual issues and using the internet
are important topics as well.
Concepts:
-
Three
basic considerations: the rights of the participants, researcher’s safe working
environment and carefully planned research operation that does not breech the
standards of justice.
-
Conflicts
of interest can be a problem
-
Context is important. Information can be
gathered directly or indirectly.
-
Internet = blurred space between public and
private
-
Surveillance creeping and lurking; webcam layer
on Google Maps
Example:
The
reference made to Google maps really struck me because I never would have
considered that to be an unethical program, but in several cases it has
violated people’s privacy and disregarded the fact that they have not consented
to having their image put on the internet. It exemplifies how tricky the
internet is to deal with ethically, because it represents a space that is
neither private nor public, so the same rules that apply to each are difficult
to follow online.
Position:
The article was informative and
pointed out some information that I perhaps would have looked passed while
conducting visual research. It is
important to find a way of representing information in a way that does not
violate sensitivity or anonymity. Conflicts of interest should also be taken
into consideration so that the participant and/or artist are not put into
compromising situations.
Question:
-
Is there a case, such as Google maps, in which
the greater good overrides the ethical objections of a few?
No comments:
Post a Comment